🔗 Share this article

Ten years following the UK stumbled into a rushed referendum that polarised the nation and triggered turmoil, a advisory emerges from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Policymakers and voters entered unwittingly Brexit and the similar could occur with a referendum on a unified Ireland, triggering disturbances for which no one is ready.

That conveys the caution from two respected journalists from either side of the Irish border who have joined forces to examine the pros and cons of Northern Ireland exiting the UK to create a different country with the Republic of Ireland.

Administrative Institutions Unprepared

Fintan O’Toole and The Northern Ireland editor, have concluded that the government bodies in Ireland and Britain are extremely unready for a potentially contentious and transformative referendum.

"The crucial insight of Brexit remains unheeded, which is that developments can come out of the blue and can gain traction swiftly," the commentator stated. "I would suggest that the political architecture of our archipelago remains highly fragile."

New Title Intends to Provoke Discussion

The pair have studied the governmental, financial and cultural arguments for any constitutional change in a publication, The Case For and Against Unification, issued by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They seek to provoke discussion on the topic with a series of speaking events that will lead them to Westminster in the coming weeks.

"What haunts all parties, or ought to concern all involved, is the Brexit vote of 2016," said O’Toole.

"We must avoid a national vote on a yes-no, unclear proposal whose implications have remained undefined because then you find yourself with an extraordinarily split population where those defeated are resistant to losing and the victorious side are uncertain quite what it is that they have gained."

Constitutional Provision

Under the peace accord, the Northern Ireland government minister is obliged to schedule a referendum on Irish unification if it seems probable that a majority would approve.

Sinn Féin and other nationalists argue such a time is imminent, and a organisation named Ireland’s Future has rallied support, but authorities in Dublin and London and unionists minimise the possibility, making it uncertain whether or when there might be a national vote.

Lack of Serious Debate

Ideological statements for and against unification has obscured the shortage of substantive discussion, noted the journalist.

"People tend to be supportive or opposed the idea but the concrete planning which may surpass that to make it possible has largely not occurred. Much has occurred in scholarly circles but scarcely any elected officials or activists seek to involve themselves even with the essentials. To illustrate, what sort of state should be desired? Centralised? Decentralised?"

Book's Approach

In the volume, no writer supports unity or the current situation. They composes two pieces that seek impartiality in detailing the case for a united Ireland and the argument opposing it, marshalling economic and societal figures, past examples and constitutional models.

Debates encompass flags and symbols, levies, health services, pensions, public liabilities and the threat of unionist unrest. The objective is to inform and provoke conversation.

"There is significant curiosity in the issue but there has not yet occurred a dialogue," said the writer. "Discussion indicates an recognition of the idea that there might be valid points on both sides."

Dual Referendums

A referendum in Northern Ireland would also trigger one in the Republic of Ireland, where the electorate say they favour unification but reject greater financial contributions or introducing a new flag to reflect pro-UK communities' UK heritage.

"The Irish government does need to establish what the offer from pro-unification movements is aside from just declaring: 'We want a unified Ireland and we value you'," said the commentator.

Likelihood of Referendum

The journalist considers a national vote in his lifetime is probable and that it may take place abruptly. "It is possible just a irresponsible or a bad or a incompetent official who says: 'Let's just do this and get it out of the way.'"

Both pro-unification advocates and unionists have plausible, valid points, he commented. "Somebody will succeed in this matter and the other side will in the end be defeated but all factions has got something to gain from the other's arguments."

Appeal for Wider Dialogue

Westminster should engage with the dialogue, stated O’Toole. "This involves Britain. It is a British question just as much as it is an Irish issue."